Here is a statement from this post:
“So praxeological truths can be used to make contingent predictions by means of conditional statements (e.g., if x, then y) about the future, but the Austrian is not a “praxeologist” when doing this, but a ‘forecaster.'”
However, the Austrian IS a praxeologist when doing this. The praxeologist isn’t even stating whether “x” will actually occur!
Jeez. I am not even going into his confusions about the Austrian position on marginal utility.
I could be giving Lord Keynes way too much credit. He could just be the worlds biggest troll for all I know.